← Practice

Iron Ark PLLC · Practice

Art & authentication litigation.

Authenticity · attribution · art fraud · provenance · foundations

Iron Ark PLLC represents collectors, estates, dealers, and galleries when the authenticity, attribution, title, or value of an artwork is challenged. Typical matters include disputes with artist foundations and authentication boards, fraud and misrepresentation claims over private and auction sales, consignment and dealer disputes, and title and provenance claims. Brian C. Kerr has litigated high-profile authenticity fights, including the antitrust and fraud litigation involving the Andy Warhol Foundation and its authentication board – chronicled in Richard Dorment's Warhol After Warhol (2023) – and the 2014 collectors' suit over works attributed to Keith Haring. He has also taught the legal issues in buying and selling art as Practising Law Institute faculty. Art cases turn on documents most litigators never read closely: invoices, consignment agreements, certificates, catalogue entries, and the provenance chain. We take strong claims on contingency and price other matters as flat fees by phase.

What we handle

i.

Authenticity and attribution disputes, including challenges to certificates and prior opinions.

ii.

Claims involving artist foundations, authentication boards, and catalogue raisonné committees.

iii.

Fraud and misrepresentation in private sales, dealer transactions, and auctions.

iv.

Consignment, gallery, and dealer disputes, including unpaid proceeds and undisclosed markups.

v.

Title and provenance claims, including disputed ownership and chain-of-title gaps.

vi.

Warranty, rescission, and damages claims when a work's value collapses.

Brian's art-law record

i.

Authenticity and antitrust litigation involving the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts and the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board (S.D.N.Y.), chronicled in Richard Dorment's Warhol After Warhol (Picador / Pegasus Books, 2023).

ii.

2014 collectors' suit over the authentication of works attributed to Keith Haring (S.D.N.Y.).

iii.

Faculty, Practising Law Institute – “Art of the Art Deal: An Introduction to the Key Legal Issues in the Buying and Selling of Art.”

iv.

Host and presenter, NeueHouse – “Is it Real?” (May 7, 2015), on the role of science in art authentication.

How it is priced

Collectors and estates with strong claims against a seller, dealer, or foundation that can pay may qualify for contingency or a hybrid structure. Other matters are priced as flat fees by phase.

When the network comes in

Typical additions are conservators and forensic scientists, provenance researchers, art-market valuation experts, and foreign counsel when a work, seller, or archive sits abroad. Network counsel work on assignments the lead team defines, and their work is reviewed before it goes out. Their cost sits inside the fee structure agreed at engagement – and on contingency matters, network attorneys join us on contingency.

Coverage

The Independent · “The extraordinary inside story of the $100m Andy Warhol Foundation fraud that shook the art world,” Jan. 14, 2024
The New York Times · “Collectors of Keith Haring Works File Lawsuit,” Feb. 21, 2014
Artnet News · “Authenticity Fight Over Keith Haring Paintings Raises Complex Questions,” Feb. 26, 2014
Financial Times · “Where Art is Off the Wall,” Feb. 28, 2014
Barron's · “Art Law Rising,” Feb. 23, 2015
The Art Newspaper · “The Price Tag of Contemporary Art is Just the Beginning of What it Will Cost You,” Dec. 2, 2015
The Independent · “Warhol Wars: Legal battle over authenticity,” Oct. 23, 2011
Agence France-Presse · “Warhol Collector's Monopoly Suit Gets Green Light,” May 27, 2009
Bloomberg · “Joe Simon Asks Judge to Let Him Question Aging Witnesses,” Mar. 24, 2009
The Art Newspaper · “Warhol Board Faces Threat of Class Action,” Aug. 31, 2007

When the work is questioned, the paper trail answers.

Discuss your matter →